Conclusion Tarzan X: Shame of Jane functions as both a parody of and a participant in a legacy of problematic mythmaking. Its aesthetic choices—campy performance, low-budget artifice, and overt eroticism—make it a compelling case study for discussions about parody, exploitation, and the cultural afterlives of canonical texts. Critical engagement should remain attentive to the power dynamics and representational harms embedded even in texts that claim to be merely humorous or transgressive.